In New Product Concept Testing, The "How" Matters

Tuesday, 07 February 2017 10:41
Blog author: 

Greetings! In product concept development, marketers tend to invest most of their time in getting the features and benefits customer language right. They spend much less time focusing on how to describe the technology used to deliver the benefits. I feel they should reconsider this prioritization approach.

Curious to learn more? Read on dear friends...

In New Product Concept Testing, The "How" Matters

In today's new product development environment, companies should incorporate external input options as part of concept screening tests.

When your company currently screens its new product concepts, it likely assumes a given technology will be employed to deliver the promised consumer benefits. Much more emphasis is likely placed on getting the benefit/feature positioning language right than on evaluating consumer reaction to potential technology alternatives. That is certainly a reasonable approach, but I also think it is potentially limiting.

In today's open innovation environment, I feel that companies should test viable technology options to help them form a basis for opening discussions with prospective business partners. Importantly, doing so can also help companies to decide how important a given external technology is to the concept's overall consumer appeal and can inform how to attach value to it relative to other viable alternatives, especially when the technical differences are relatively modest. Here's a hypothetical example:

Acme Healthcare Company is looking to evaluate consumer interest in a new, natural product to treat IBS. They have technically evaluated their options and have rank ordered them for efficacy. In concept testing, Acme would ordinarily use a place-holder for the technical reason to believe. However, in testing technology alternatives, they learn that consumers are very interested in a concept that uses omega fish oil, based largely on its strong reputation and use in personal care products. They are significantly less interested in a concept that employs hydrolyzed white fish protein, despite this material being technically superior to omega fish oil. Knowing this, Acme can now decide how much emphasis to place on acquiring access to the omega fish oil, and how to value it relative to the fish protein.

Does this topic sound like it could be relevant to your new product team? If so, please contact me to discuss.

"Connecting You With The Right Solutions" BFS Innovations, Inc.

Since 2005, BFS Innovations has helped its Fortune 500 clients with technology scouting, new business creation and business development services. Contact Michael today at This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. or at 614 937-2408 to discuss your company's needs.




Read 504 times

©2017 BFS Innovations, Inc. All rights reserved.